Angular Package Format compatible distribution

[trotyl]

I'm submitting a...

[ ] Bug report  
[x] Feature request
[ ] Documentation issue or request
[ ] Regression (a behavior that used to work and stopped working in a new release)
[ ] Support request => Please do not submit support request here

Current behavior

Whatever opposite to expected behavior.

Expected behavior

Goals

• Clean distribution, no sources, tests or other meaningless files;
• Main FESM15 distribution following Angular Package Format for entire lib;
• Main FESM5 distribution following Angular Package Format for entire lib;
• Main UMD distribution following Angular Package Format for entire lib (with minified version);
• Plunker template/starter;
• Compatible with Angular CLI (add integration test);
• Compatible with Webpack (add integration test);
• Compatible with Rollup (add integration test);

Non-Goals

• Compatible with Closure Compiler ADVANCED mode (too hard);
• Compatible with server-side rendering (could be done later);
• Well-defined documentation for all possible usages (would be done in separate card);
• Correct sourcemap to original .ts files (having technical problems);
• Individual bundle for each component (secondary entries in Angular package are individual modules, not partial ones, would require new designs);
• Stackblitz template/starter (it's unable to customize package source, need to wait for release);

Minimal reproduction of the problem with instructions

What is the motivation / use case for changing the behavior?

Environment

Angular version: X.Y.Z

ng-zorro-antd version: X.Y.Z

Browser:
- [ ] Chrome (desktop) version XX
- [ ] Firefox version XX
- [ ] Safari (desktop) version XX
- [ ] IE version XX
 
For Tooling issues:
- Node version: XX  
- Platform:  

Others:

[trotyl]

Will follow the new format introduced by angular/angular@fd701b0.

[trotyl]

Initial version of plunker template here.

[cipchk]

Don't dismiss a follower and expect them to keep items!

+++++++++++++1 for @trotyl

[yupengfei]

Will Closure Compiler ADVANCED possible in future?

[trotyl]

@yupengfei Not even a feature request for that yet.

[lock]

This thread has been automatically locked because it has not had recent activity. Please open a new issue for related bugs and link to relevant comments in this thread.