Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

question on fid50k_full metric after resuming training on a larger dataset #90

Open
MoemaMike opened this issue Mar 27, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@MoemaMike
Copy link

I trained my model on a dataset of 2500 images for about 4 days and was getting good results with steady dropping fid50k_full metric. At that point i decided to enlarge the dataset to 7000 images. So i added 4500 to the original 2500 bringing total to 7000 and i resumed training with this superset.

Given the very heterogenous nature of this dataset i expected the fid50k_full metric to go way up initially upon the resumed training and then gradually decline again. But surprisingly the metric held steady and continued to decline very slowly .. which was a pleasant surprise but it makes me wonder if that is the expected behavior. i thought the additional images in the training set would present a much bigger challenge and cause it to spike up?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant