This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 13, 2023. It is now read-only.
Replies: 2 comments
-
@Jiehong Given the bespoke nature of this feature, and the number of gotcha's we need to consider in this implementation, we think it's best not to implement this in Conductor. However, if this is something you only need in the UI, that might be rather simple to implement. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
@kishorebanala : fair enough, I agree with the big extra complexity required for this feature. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi,
We've seen some people use workflows with sensitive information in the parameters of the workflow.
For example, requesting a service token to call a special http service.
But anyone seeing that workflow execution can then see that token value, and that's not great.
I'm wondering if having workflow input parameters hidden could help.
For example, you could define a workflow input parameter as such:
Now, anywhere that value is used in the workflow (with
${workflow.input.parameter-to-hide}
) would be replaced by "****" when retrieving the workflow, but the actual value would still be visible to tasks themselves.I do see some cons:
What do you think?
If you have a better idea for such a usecase, feel free to explain it!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions