You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since there is limited space for directing attention towards supporters of the Nix ecosystem, it seems worthwhile to define sponsorship tiers (or levels). One example is how the Haskell Foundation does it.
Idea: Instead of listing all supporters indiscriminately, show the most impactful ones in tiers. Instead of determining a particular range for each tier, categorise by support volume.
Show the top supporters most prominently in a way that is discoverable for observers of the NixOS Foundation's activities.
A support tier is valid for a year.
Sponsorship needs exposure.
Since there is limited space for directing attention towards supporters of the Nix ecosystem, it seems worthwhile to define sponsorship tiers (or levels). One example is how the Haskell Foundation does it.
Proposal
(Drafted together with @mightyiam and @imincik).
Idea: Instead of listing all supporters indiscriminately, show the most impactful ones in tiers. Instead of determining a particular range for each tier, categorise by support volume.
Show the top supporters most prominently in a way that is discoverable for observers of the NixOS Foundation's activities.
A support tier is valid for a year.
Community tier
Top 4-8
As in community tier, but show medium size logo, also
Top 3
As in Top 4-8, but with large size logo.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: