New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

RFC Meeting 2020-01-23 #29

Closed

edolstra opened this issue Jan 23, 2020 · 4 comments

Member

edolstra commented Jan 23, 2020 •

edited by worldofpeace

Loading

General business

Unlabeled RFCs and New RFCs

None

RFCs Open for Nominations

RFC 32 - Phase running changes for better nix-shell use - have @Ericson2314 and @lheckemann, need 1 more shepherd
RFC 64 - New Documentation Format for nixpkgs and NixOS

RFCs in Discussion

RFC 17 - Intensional Store: No progress since end of November.
RFC 40 - "Ret-cont" recursive Nix: needs meeting (@globin to ping - I think he was pinged)
RFC 42 - NixOS Config Options: meeting soon
RFC 49 - Flakes: work ongoing, may have meeting soon
RFC 50 - Merge bot for maintainers: @aanderse has been appointed as leader. Meeting to be scheduled.
RFC 54 - Support levels and tiers - more discussion
RFC 55 - Retire inactive nixpkgs committers - in discussion
RFC 56 - CI all Nix PRs - in discussion
RFC 58 - Named Ellipses - in discussion
RFC 59 - Systemd Service Secrets - @aanderse, @globin and @dhess accepted
RFC 62 - Content-addressed paths - @layus, @edolstra and @Ericson2314 accepted

RFCs in FCP

None

Accepted/Rejected

RFC 46 - Platform Support Tiers

Member Author

edolstra commented Jan 23, 2020

Notes:

Will ping a couple more potential shepherds on RFC 32 and 64.

Contributor

worldofpeace commented Jan 23, 2020

@edolstra In a PM I asked @jtojnar if he'd like to shepherd RFC 64 and he accepted.

Member

Mic92 commented Jan 24, 2020

@worldofpeace could you also add this to the RFC itself, otherwise it might get lost.

Contributor

worldofpeace commented Jan 24, 2020

@worldofpeace could you also add this to the RFC itself, otherwise it might get lost.

Did that.

worldofpeace closed this as completed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment