You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In job j-240902ff18204cc38e0256e8872702b9 on the Terrascope backend, I load in a STAC collection. The STAC collection can be found in the attachment. The temporal extent ranges from 2016 to 2018. I then apply median compositing using the aggregate_temporal_period process. Finally, I use aggregate_spatial to extract some points to geoparquet format.
The resulting geoparquet file unexpectedly contains a timeseries ranging from 1970-2062 in monthly timesteps. Due to this, the batch job took a long time to run and used many credits.
Without applying aggregate_temporal_period, the timeseries in the resulting geoparquet varies from 2016 to 2018, as expected. This leads me to believe that the problem lies within the aggregate_temporal_period process being used after load_stac.
In job j-240902ff18204cc38e0256e8872702b9 on the Terrascope backend, I load in a STAC collection. The STAC collection can be found in the attachment. The temporal extent ranges from 2016 to 2018. I then apply median compositing using the
aggregate_temporal_period
process. Finally, I useaggregate_spatial
to extract some points to geoparquet format.The resulting geoparquet file unexpectedly contains a timeseries ranging from 1970-2062 in monthly timesteps. Due to this, the batch job took a long time to run and used many credits.
Without applying
aggregate_temporal_period
, the timeseries in the resulting geoparquet varies from 2016 to 2018, as expected. This leads me to believe that the problem lies within theaggregate_temporal_period
process being used afterload_stac
.collection.json
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: