We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
To make ERC20 gas efficient!!
Hi All,
I have been working with required statements and custom errors. Since we know "require" statements take more gas because it returns a string.
Why does openZeppline not change a "require" statement to custom errors "if" statement?
is there any particular reason "require" statements are still in the saferERC20 contract?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is a duplicate of #2839 #3614
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
To make ERC20 gas efficient!!
Hi All,
I have been working with required statements and custom errors. Since we know "require" statements take more gas because it returns a string.
Why does openZeppline not change a "require" statement to custom errors "if" statement?
is there any particular reason "require" statements are still in the saferERC20 contract?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: