You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
train.txt 4229 objects test.txt 1126 objects
This is how we divided the dataset in our benchmark experiments. But you can also divide them differently.
Did you merge all the datasets and randomly shuffle them? I have a strange result that the performance on the test set is actually better than that on the training set.
The train/test sets are indeed divided randomly, except for some categories that contain only a few instances, which are all sorted to the test set.
So I cannot explain why your algorithm has a higher performance on the test set...
Hello, I am developing a grasping algorithm using your dataset. I would like to ask how are the training and test sets in your data set divided?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: