Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More flexibility with changes in spending policy #983

Open
jdebacker opened this issue Sep 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

More flexibility with changes in spending policy #983

jdebacker opened this issue Sep 6, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@jdebacker
Copy link
Member

OG-Core allows users to specify gov't spending on non-pension transfers ($TR_t$), infrastructure ($I_{g,t}$), and gov't consumption expenditures ($G_t$) by providing the ratio of spending on these items to GDP with the parameters $\alpha_{tr,t}$, $\alpha_{G,t}$, and $\alpha_{I,t}$. This is helpful for calibrating the model as one doesn't need to worry about units of measurement.

However, this imposes a very specific assumption when looking at counterfactual scenarios. In particular, it implies that these gov't spending amounts grow with the economy (not a bad assumption given what we observe in the US, but it is limiting).

The parameter baseline_spending can hold spending amounts in the counterfactual simulation at the same level as in the baseline run. This allows one to avoid the assumption that the amount of spending will grow with the size of the economy.

However, one might wish to make changes in spending policy relative to the baseline level (not the baseline ratio to GDP, which can be done with the current parameters noted above). Thus, it would be useful to create 3 new share parameters that could specify the relative change from the baseline level of spending that would be impose when baseline_spending=True.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant