-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 172
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Some important feedforward models to be supported at first stage #24
Comments
@kuke I think we can collect all the ops needed to be converted required by the listed models. |
Yeah, I agree with @pkuyym . I think it might be better to do design the unit test framework for a variety of operators. |
I also agree with that unit test is very important, so I assign it to myself. But if you are interested in verifying the correctness of models' conversion, you can work on one now. From my experience, a runnable model will help you test the related operator's conversion and the unit test is not necessary. |
@varunarora Great! It is the time to have a friendly README and installation. I am going to continue to work on models' conversion. I think rest of us can pick up a model or general operators' conversion. You see we have a lot of operators waiting to be implemented the conversion. |
demo commit for adding inference testing case
We are going to support the conversion of models as follows at first stage. They all can be found in our models bank, some maybe only need to be verified after #19 merged, and some lack of necessary operators.
Even all the models above are supported, only a small subset of operators are used and verified. So for the rest operators, we may need another task:
Hints:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: