-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 559
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AIX locale setting fails on one machine #14695
Comments
From @khwilliamsonThis is a bug report for perl from khw@khw.(none), This is to make this email thread into a bug report so that it can be This is being made a blocker for 5.22 until we decide how to proceed. I have been granted access to that machine, but there isn't enough disk Flags: Site configuration information for perl 5.22.0: Configured by khw at Fri May 8 20:27:28 MDT 2015. Summary of my perl5 (revision 5 version 22 subversion 0) configuration: Locally applied patches: @INC for perl 5.22.0: Environment for perl 5.22.0: PATH=/home/khw/bin:/home/khw/perl5/perlbrew/bin:/home/khw/print/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/games:/usr/local/games:/home/khw/iands/www:/home/khw/cxoffice/bin |
From @khwilliamsonI don't think this is a Perl problem, and I know it isn't a new Perl problem, so I have removed it as a 5.22 blocker. Michael granted me access to a failing machine, and I downloaded and compiled 5.20.2 and got the same failure. This proves it isn't a regression introduced in the 5.21 series, so it isn't a 5.22 blocker. I don't know why it suddenly showed up. Michael speculated to me privately that the xlc smoke reports were masking the gcc ones, as this shows up only with gcc. And, given that truss and dbx are indicating a failing libc call, it seems pretty unlikely to be a Perl bug. -- |
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
From @iabynOn Sun, May 10, 2015 at 10:11:16AM -0700, Karl Williamson via RT wrote:
Hi Karl, any particular reason why this ticket has been marked as a 5.26.0 -- |
From @khwilliamsonOn 03/20/2017 09:34 AM, Dave Mitchell wrote:
See http://nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/243217 All BBC tickets should be reviewed to decide if they should be blockers. |
From @iabynOn Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:40:11AM -0600, Karl Williamson wrote:
In that case, do you think it should be a blocker, either for 5.26.0 or -- |
From @khwilliamsonOn 03/20/2017 11:04 AM, Dave Mitchell wrote:
I merely did a bulk move. I don't think this should be a blocker |
From @khwilliamsonMichael, since this ticket was opened, new debugging has been added so that we can more easily see what's going on. If you could take a recent version of blead, compiled with -DDEBUGGING, and with this set: export PERL_DEBUG_LOCALE_INIT=1 and run your test again on it, and send us the output -- |
From @khwilliamsonI have now removed this from the list of 5.26 blockers, and renamed it so that it won't get added again. -- |
From @aixtoolsI had many system changes, among them one of the systems I could Hope that helps! Michael On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Karl Williamson via RT
|
From @khwilliamsonOn Tue, 28 Mar 2017 08:02:26 -0700, aixtools@gmail.com wrote:
Any status on this? |
From @khwilliamsonNo response from OP in a year; marking this stalled |
@khwilliamson - Status changed from 'open' to 'stalled' |
No respone in 4 years; closing |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#125142 (status was 'stalled')
Searchable as RT125142$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: