-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release 1.22.0 bis – 1 March 2021 #3287
Comments
MyselfHere's what I'm thinking for the next release: I want to explore and/or spec out all these features which we have mentioned/discussed at some point. From there, determine which one would be the highest impact (both considering impact as a feature and for our own dogfooding), spec it out in detail:
I'm on the fence on whether we should explore right now, as this sound like might require a different, more comprehensive approach, but open to suggestions,
In addition to the above:
Team
|
My points:
|
Plugins on cloud:
Other important tasks:
Stretch goal:
|
MyselfThe previous release was spent working on stability improvements. We've done great on that front - our sentry at least is a lot less noisy than before. Further stability improvementsHowever, there are still quite a few top-level issues which need looking into:
New featuresRather than full maintencence mode, let's also ship new things/value:
Or anything else w/ sessions/core analytics? Build competence there. Misc
TBD, did not manage to fill this out. |
Myself
Stretch:
|
quick update for myself
|
Also one thing I'd like to do is work on an engineering blog post touching on plugins, but that'll require some more thought (a short series would do well for instance) and is not a significant priority. |
One thing that came up for me that wasn't planned is https://github.com/PostHog/ops/issues/178 (@jamesefhawkins maybe you want to provide some additional context on its priority). I think it's worth using this as an example of what do we want to do when we need to re-prioritize some stuff mid-release. Currently we just take on whatever seems more urgent/important at the time, which is fine, but it can sometimes lead to not the best possible outcome, because the most immediate thing always tends to seem like the most important and urgent one. If for instance right now we agree that this is more pressing that any of the other stuff already planned, we can now consciously remove something that was planned and will now get bumped out. What are people's general thoughts on this? |
Released. |
Context:
Tim
Paolo
Explore, research and/or spec out for new features 🔍 FocusChurn prediction & prevention Allow analyzing cohorts (new users, active users, slipping away users) #3032Retention leaderboard Idea: Retention leaderboard #2828Expand integrations triggers, basically removing the need for a Zapier/n8n for technical users Workflow triggers feature #3357Data taxonomy Taxonomy #3228Exporting dashboards, sharing dashboards with context, increase collaboration for people outside the scope of the product/eng/design team* Dashboard collaboration / sharing metrics #3344A/B testing suite (check hubspot for feedback)Carryover from past release, check persons-2353 & 1694-dashboards, and release or kill.From PostHog/retention#11, consider spinning out activation from core retention, and explore if it makes sense to do it as a feature. (initial approach: https://github.com/PostHog/retention/issues/13)Michael/Marius
Post-Mortem for the outageGradually re-release plugin server ingestion on cloudDefence against malicious plugins Defend against malicious plugins plugin-server#57 (!! this is an important one)Karl/Eric
James G
-Template the Helm chart (values.yaml) so that we have one values template for everyone ( we have already hit issues with this with inconsistencies)
Yakko
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: