Standard errors tracking

[kaievns]

This is a must have. It just plummets my performance if errors are not handled properly both in dev and prod.

I saw you added the unhandledRejects, but I don't think that cuts it. You need to have logged the errors somewhere like sentry or airbrake in prod and it should properly capture the context and stack trace. Also in dev it should show a proper and meaningful stack-trace + don't crash and automatically reboot when changes to the code are made

[davidbanham]

Yep, great logging and error tracking is definitely something we need to have.

In my mind, there's a piece of work to be done around togglable info level logging in the routes, resources, etc.

And yes, we should definitely tune up the unhandledRejection code to print the stack trace along with the reason.

https://github.com/Prismatik/redbeard/blob/0775bb2013621dc0c2c989ec61de79ef609bd215/base/index.mustache#L25

don't crash and automatically reboot when changes to the code are made

That's a job for a bin script with something like chokidar rather than the error reporter, IMO.

[kaievns]

That's a job for a bin script with something like chokidar rather than the error reporter, IMO.

totally agreed. just thought it could part of this ticket. to make sure that as a dev i have it all setup properly by the generator

[davidbanham]

I'm going to create a new ticket for it. Purely because the autorunner is a simple thing someone might pick up in a spare 15 minutes, whereas the logging piece is a bigger job.

[kaievns]

agreed, makes total sense