Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

distributing and publishing apps made with Greenwood #574

Closed
1 of 5 tasks
thescientist13 opened this issue Apr 25, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed
1 of 5 tasks

distributing and publishing apps made with Greenwood #574

thescientist13 opened this issue Apr 25, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested RFC Proposal and changes to workflows, architecture, APIs, etc
Milestone

Comments

@thescientist13
Copy link
Member

thescientist13 commented Apr 25, 2021

Type of Change

  • New Feature Request
  • Documentation / Website
  • Improvement / Suggestion
  • Bug
  • Other (please clarify below)

Summary

Following in the theme of #570 , an underlying theme is that others could create apps built on top of Greenwood. But what would that look like and what would best practices / options look like?

  1. Should everything just be a plugin?
  2. Or can projects depend on @greenwood/cli directly?
  3. And what are the options, using a GitHub or actually publishing to npm?

Details

So this may not even require anything of Greenwood specifically, but instead maybe just experimentation and documentation?

For something simple, degit may be an option. Or maybe Greenwood can / should create a community "installer?

@thescientist13 thescientist13 added question Further information is requested RFC Proposal and changes to workflows, architecture, APIs, etc labels Apr 25, 2021
@thescientist13 thescientist13 added this to the 1.0 milestone Apr 25, 2021
@ProjectEvergreen ProjectEvergreen locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 20, 2021

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
question Further information is requested RFC Proposal and changes to workflows, architecture, APIs, etc
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant