Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unplausible evolution of urban central heat balance #114

Open
1 of 4 tasks
cpschau opened this issue Jun 17, 2024 · 10 comments
Open
1 of 4 tasks

Unplausible evolution of urban central heat balance #114

cpschau opened this issue Jun 17, 2024 · 10 comments
Assignees

Comments

@cpschau
Copy link
Contributor

cpschau commented Jun 17, 2024

The urban central heat balance is currently containing some unplausible elements:

  • High investments in gas boilers until 2030 (likely to be fixed after solving Validation of European CHP capacities #74)
  • Declining shares of air-sourced heat pumps
  • Too much waste heat from Electrolysis and Fischer-Tropsch
  • Remaining importance of CHP plants
    urban_central_heat_evolution
@lindnemi
Copy link
Collaborator

Waste heat share seems to be down to a reasonable number now

Image

@lindnemi
Copy link
Collaborator

latest 3H run (Balanced scenario)

Image

@lindnemi
Copy link
Collaborator

lindnemi commented Aug 9, 2024

latest 3H run (Balanced scenario)

Image

@amos-schledorn
Copy link

I've started looking into this in a little more detail:
image

  • Importance of CHP units seems to be mainly waste-fired CHP generation with CC.
  • Resistive heaters seem to only run when heat pumps run at fill capacity (i.e. no artificial curtailment).
  • So, the large share of resistive heating might come down to much lower investment costs compared to heat pumps (63 EUR/kWh vs. 906 EUR/kWh) - this is in line with the DEA techn. catalogue. Merging Approximate district heating COPs via Jensen et al. 2018 pypsa-eur#1175 might increase heat pump COPs and shift this balance towards them.

@lindnemi
Copy link
Collaborator

Latest 3H run (Focus Electricity scenario)

Image

@lindnemi
Copy link
Collaborator

Much higher share of heat pumps, still a relatively large share of e-boilers and CHPs. Are we satisfied with these results?

@cpschau
Copy link
Contributor Author

cpschau commented Sep 11, 2024

I am still confused about the large amounts of heat stored in hot water storage systems that are not utilized on the supply side. Why doesn't the model use heat vents for curtailing excess heat?

@amos-schledorn
Copy link

The unused stored heat seems odd to me, too. As does the declining power-to-heat utilisation (of installed capacity) in favour of CHP generation in 2040. I guess this might come down to biomass CCS, @lindnemi ?

@lindnemi
Copy link
Collaborator

Image

@amos-schledorn
Copy link

  • unused heat storage is actually losses. This is because water tanks are actually PTES, which have higher standing losses. I've checked for two examples and standing losses match the "unused heat".
    Issue submitted to technology-data repo: Central water tank storage uses PTES data technology-data#143
  • decreasing heat pump utilisation in favour of CHP generation is waste CHP-CC in particular (see table below). I'm guessing that the model does this for CO2 sequestration.

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants