Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove workers from ray-cluster #1397

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 2, 2024
Merged

Remove workers from ray-cluster #1397

merged 4 commits into from
Aug 2, 2024

Conversation

Tansito
Copy link
Member

@Tansito Tansito commented Jul 2, 2024

Summary

Due to some problems in the current configuration that we have in the cluster we cannot support workers right now. After some tests I could confirm that we can support the same features that we are supporting right now increasing the size of the head node.

So, this PR modifies the ray-cluster template removing the workers from the configuration.

@Tansito Tansito added the WIP work in progress label Jul 2, 2024
# Conflicts:
#	charts/qiskit-serverless/charts/gateway/templates/rayclustertemplate.yaml
@Tansito Tansito changed the title 🏗️ Optimize ray-cluster template Remove workers from ray-cluster Jul 31, 2024
@Tansito Tansito marked this pull request as ready for review July 31, 2024 18:20
@Tansito
Copy link
Member Author

Tansito commented Jul 31, 2024

@akihikokuroda reviewing the configuration of the cluster I had a question related with the values:

  • useCertManager
  • useTLS

Would has sense to only do useCertManager if we enable useTLS? Right now we are always adding the certs independently of that.

@akihikokuroda
Copy link
Collaborator

Would has sense to only do useCertManager if we enable useTLS? Right now we are always adding the certs independently of that.

It means that it doesn't create the self-signed certificates. I think that's OK. If the cluster doesn't have the cert manager, the TLS may not be needed.

@Tansito Tansito removed the WIP work in progress label Jul 31, 2024
@Tansito
Copy link
Member Author

Tansito commented Jul 31, 2024

And with Istio I suppose that they are not needed either, aren't they?

@akihikokuroda
Copy link
Collaborator

@Tansito That's right.

Copy link
Collaborator

@psschwei psschwei left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would save updates to the TLS / certmanager options for another PR.

@Tansito
Copy link
Member Author

Tansito commented Jul 31, 2024

I would save updates to the TLS / certmanager options for another PR.

Sure!

@Tansito Tansito merged commit 7696bbb into main Aug 2, 2024
10 checks passed
@Tansito Tansito deleted the remove-workers branch August 2, 2024 17:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants