-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
breaking change: explore alternative to handling "real" datasets in this package #303
Comments
@cjyetman I know you don't have a lot/ any context on this, but let me know if you have thoughts |
I've been hoping that we make |
I think unfortunately that's way off. At some point, perhaps we can remove the data, and just have the prep functions (I am def not against that), but we need a good way of storing and versioning our data first. Until then, I think a pkg is the best way to keep the small-medium sized "real" datasets (and also make sure we are all using the same central dataset(s)) |
An, in particular these two datasets are pretty scenario specific anyway: The other two we would need to figure out how to store somewhere: |
This breaking change is too large given the current Tagging as "wontfix" |
This package currently serves two purposes.
1 - To provide mock data used for CI/CD, testing and demonstration purposes
2 - It contains a few "real" datasets that are actually used in the banks analysis
We should explore if this is actually desirable, and potentially find an alternative path to distribute "real" datasets.
Real datasets include:
sector_classifications
(and all datasets inside that dataset)green_or_brown
iso_codes
region_isos
Some of these datasets can/ should perhaps be added into the (private) package:
pacta.scenario.preparation
Note: this would require equivalent changes in:
https://github.com/RMI-PACTA/r2dii.match
https://github.com/RMI-PACTA/r2dii.analysis
AB#10166
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: