Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Liquidity Ads Interface #67

Open
saubyk opened this issue Apr 30, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Liquidity Ads Interface #67

saubyk opened this issue Apr 30, 2022 · 3 comments
Assignees
@diogorsergio
Labels
CoreLightning enhancement New feature or request Liquidity Ads

Comments

@saubyk
Copy link
Collaborator

saubyk commented Apr 30, 2022

Menu placement after the Peers/Channel menu under Lightning.
Two sections on the page:

  1. Liquidity Ask: The channel amount that the user wants to buy and the channel opening fee rate user is willing to pay
  2. Nodes Advertising Liquidity: The ads section, with the following features:
  • Filters to search on the basis of node capacity and the channel count
  • Top Ad suggestions on the basis of opening cost or routing fee
  • Grid to show more Ads from the graph
  • Ability to navigate to specific ad to research and request channel from

Node - Liquidity Ads - expanded
@saubyk
Copy link
Collaborator Author

saubyk commented Apr 30, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Information to educate the users on:

  • Liquidity Ask
  • Nodes Advertising Liquidity

Node - Liquidity Ads - Ask info
Node - Liquidity Ads - Ad info

@saubyk
Copy link
Collaborator Author

saubyk commented Apr 30, 2022

View Information on the Ad
Node - LAds - Actions - View Info

@saubyk
Copy link
Collaborator Author

saubyk commented Apr 30, 2022

Open Channel with the Ad
Node - LAds - Channel Open

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@diogorsergio diogorsergio

Labels
CoreLightning enhancement New feature or request Liquidity Ads
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@saubyk @diogorsergio