Getting started: Would you like to suggest a new paper? Click here!

[pedrohbraga]

Hello!

If you would like to suggest a new paper that should be read or cited in this project's manuscript, please read the instructions below, which comes from the Suggesting a paper section from the CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines.

You should begin by:

1. Choosing a paper;
2. Searching for its title or its DOI in the Relevant Papers discussion section;
3. If the paper you would like to suggest has been already suggested, contribute to the discussion by adding your view about the research piece;
4. If the paper is not already discussed, create a New Discussion categorized as "Relevant Papers", with the paper title as Title, and with the following template filled in:

<!--Hi there! Please use this template as a guide for what information about your suggested paper to include. It is fine to leave fields blank so that other contributors can fill them in later, or to add fields that you think are important.-->

### Title: Include the manuscript's title

Study Link: Include the https:// link that brings us to the page of the manuscript
Citation: `@doi:replace`

> Citation must follow the [Manubot-style citation](https://github.com/SORTEE-Github-Hackathon/manuscript/blob/main/USAGE.md#citations). Leave it in blank, if unsure.

Suggested keywords that help identify the relevance of this paper to Ecology and Evolution:
* keyword 1 (replace me, copy and paste more than three if needed)
* keyword 2 (replace me, copy and paste more than three if needed)
* keyword 3 (replace me, copy and paste more than three if needed)

### Which areas of expertise are particularly relevant to the paper?
<!-- Mark with an x the relevant areas, i.e. [x]. -->
- [x] ecology and/or evolution;
- [ ] biostatistics;
- [ ] informatics and computational research;
- [ ] open science and reproducibility;
- [ ] other_replace_with_your_suggestion_or_delete_me.

# Summary

### Suggested questions to answer about each paper:
- What is the general main finding or takeaway of the paper?
- What did they analyze and how did they do it?
- What does this paper suggest to improve the issue with reproducibility in science?
- Do you have any concerns about methodology or the interpretation of these results beyond this analysis?

### Any comments or notes?