Low availability of code in ecology: A call for urgent action

[pedrohbraga]

Title: Low availability of code in ecology: A call for urgent action

Study Link: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000763
Citation: @doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001048

Citation must follow the Manubot-style citation. Leave it in blank, if unsure.

Suggested keywords that help identify the relevance of this paper to Ecology and Evolution:

• keyword 1 (replace me, copy and paste more than three if needed)
• keyword 2 (replace me, copy and paste more than three if needed)
• keyword 3 (replace me, copy and paste more than three if needed)

Which areas of expertise are particularly relevant to the paper?

• ecology and/or evolution
• biostatistics
• informatics and computational research
• open science and reproducibility
• other:

Summary

Suggested questions to answer about each paper:

• What is the general main finding or takeaway of the paper?
• What did they analyse and how did they do it?
• What does this paper suggest to improve the issue with reproducibility in science?
• Do you have any concerns about methodology or the interpretation of these results beyond this analysis?

Any comments or notes?