Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #3439 - Now steps can be .unstackable #3714

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2017
Merged

Conversation

TemaSM
Copy link

@TemaSM TemaSM commented Feb 18, 2016

Fix for #3439.
Now, when using .step, you may provide .unstackable (unresponsive) class to disable stacking of Step element.

@jlukic jlukic added this to the 2.1.9 milestone Feb 18, 2016
@jlukic
Copy link
Member

jlukic commented Feb 18, 2016

Thanks for posting this. Everything looks good.

I've attached a milestone and will be reviewing this as soon as I can.

@norbertpy
Copy link

Has this been merged? I'm using 2.2.1 but providing unstackable class doesn't work. It still stacks up on smaller screens.

@bcbane
Copy link

bcbane commented Nov 29, 2016

Is there a reason that this hasn't been added?

@amorphine
Copy link

Semantic 2.2.6 Still not merged. What's up?

@koloff
Copy link

koloff commented Mar 23, 2017

Please add this feature

@dgrahn
Copy link

dgrahn commented Apr 5, 2017

Hey everyone. It's kind of silly that this hasn't been integrated. So I've whipped up some code which should work.

Gist

@anhldbk
Copy link

anhldbk commented Apr 22, 2017

This is a nice feature! Hope the PR will be merged soon. 👍

@awgv awgv modified the milestones: 2.2.11, 2.1.9 Apr 22, 2017
@terrabruder
Copy link

At the width of a step, steps are basically unusable in mobile non-tablet contexts. At least with the .unstackable fix, we are able to use small horizontal sets of steps. Please consider merging this PR.

@jlukic jlukic merged commit b79a6ab into Semantic-Org:next Jul 11, 2017
@jlukic
Copy link
Member

jlukic commented Jul 11, 2017

It's in 2.2.11, thanks for your patience.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants