New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

The implementation in paper is different from a paper. #24

Open

Ho1guma opened this issue Sep 9, 2024 · 0 comments

Ho1guma commented Sep 9, 2024 •

edited

Loading

At first, thank you for a innovative paper.

I read that you "mix the two image pairs" before this pair goes to encoder(Swin Transformer).

However, there is only one image in processing part and loss part.

Code does not match with the paper.

And I trained the code with 8 GPUs and 128 batch size applying 2 accum_iteration, it did not reproduce to performance in the paper.

Is the code is not latest version?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment