Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rookify should work other setups than the reference implementation (setups with cephadm or cephansible) #94

Open
boekhorstb1 opened this issue Oct 28, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request module Rookify module test Function has to be tested

Comments

@boekhorstb1
Copy link
Contributor

  • it would be good if the Rook community could profit from Rookify:

    • this would highlight the SCS project and its Reference Implementation among all rook users
    • this would increase the likeliness that Rookify will be maintained / tested / fixed by others
  • todo:

    • create local ceph setup to run rookify on
@boekhorstb1 boekhorstb1 self-assigned this Oct 28, 2024
@NotTheEvilOne NotTheEvilOne added enhancement New feature or request module Rookify module test Function has to be tested labels Oct 28, 2024
@boekhorstb1
Copy link
Contributor Author

ok good news: tested successfully with following local cephadm based setup

4 VMs:

  • 1 master
  • 3 workers

VM stats:

  • 6G memory
  • 30GB Primary Disksize
  • various different partitions for Data-, DB- and Wall-devices for osds (about 10GB for each partition)
  • ceph version: 17.2.7 (quincy)
  • OS: ubuntu-22.04 (cloud image)

Migrated resources:

  • osds, monitors, managers, mds, prometheus, graphana, dashboard (did not test rgws yet)

@boekhorstb1
Copy link
Contributor Author

ok tested around with some rgw object, could be that I made some mistake. Got this error though:

#105

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request module Rookify module test Function has to be tested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants