Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

purrrogress #2

Open
EmilHvitfeldt opened this issue Sep 30, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

purrrogress #2

EmilHvitfeldt opened this issue Sep 30, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@EmilHvitfeldt
Copy link

Hello @TylerGrantSmith!

I just want to be aware of purrrogress in case you haven't seen it, so you don't reinvent the wheel. If your package does something different you are free to close this issue 😃

@TylerGrantSmith
Copy link
Owner

@EmilHvitfeldt ha! Thanks, I was not aware of this, and it is so similarly named. I will take a look at this, as it definitely seems to do the same thing and perhaps even with a better implementation. I didn't think about wrapping the iterated function and accessing the purrr call from inside, like this does. Thanks for the heads-up.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants