You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One of our goals has been to revisit the English fixed list and make it more systematic. From Dan Flickinger I obtained a list of the words-with-spaces in the English Resource Grammar lexicon that would function like prepositions (case) or subordinators (mark). Here is a comparison of that list and the current fixed guidelines:
In both lists
according to
as for
as if
as opposed to
as to
as well as
because of
due to
in between
in case
in case of
in order
in that
instead of
not to mention
let alone
prior to
rather than
so that
such as
whether or not
In ERG list, currently not listed as fixed in guidelines
Note that some of these fall under the Double Spatial Prepositions exception: The guidelines currently state that such expressions—out of, etc.—are NOT fixed. (We have considered changing this: notably it incorporates a semantic criterion, which may not be ideal for UD. UniversalDependencies/docs#795)
Apart from ADP+ADP combinations, we see some recurring grammaticalization patterns like ADV+ADP and ADP+NOUN+ADP. We may or may not want to treat these as fixed, but we should try to be consistent by group.
In the words-with-spaces list there are not many deverbal combinations like "based on" or "compared to/with". Above we see according to, as opposed to; below we see give or take, given that, going by, provided that, thanks to.
One of our goals has been to revisit the English
fixed
list and make it more systematic. From Dan Flickinger I obtained a list of the words-with-spaces in the English Resource Grammar lexicon that would function like prepositions (case
) or subordinators (mark
). Here is a comparison of that list and the currentfixed
guidelines:In both lists
In ERG list, currently not listed as
fixed
in guidelinesNote that some of these fall under the Double Spatial Prepositions exception: The guidelines currently state that such expressions—out of, etc.—are NOT
fixed
. (We have considered changing this: notably it incorporates a semantic criterion, which may not be ideal for UD. UniversalDependencies/docs#795)Apart from ADP+ADP combinations, we see some recurring grammaticalization patterns like ADV+ADP and ADP+NOUN+ADP. We may or may not want to treat these as
fixed
, but we should try to be consistent by group.In the words-with-spaces list there are not many deverbal combinations like "based on" or "compared to/with". Above we see according to, as opposed to; below we see give or take, given that, going by, provided that, thanks to.
In
fixed
guidelines, not in ERG listExplicitly non-
fixed
, also not in ERG lexiconOther kinds of
fixed
expressionsOf the non-prepositional
fixed
expressions, ERG has lexical entries for:as_much_as
but notas_many_as
?The
fixed
page explicitly excludes the following, though ERG has lexical entries:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: