You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, contributor,
I recently read the article Towards Explainable In-the-Wild Video Quality Assessment: A Database and a Language-Prompted Approach. Please let me know. I tried a video of my own, and the score felt like it was between 0-100. The values in the paper then correspond to the paper's "Figure 4: Qualitative studies on different specific factors, with a good video (>0.6) and a bad video (<-0.6) in each dimension of Maxwell; [A-5] Trajectory, [ T-5]Flicker, and [T-8] Fluency are focusing on temporal variations and example videos for them are appended in supplementary package. Zoom in for details.", in my example what counts as good and what counts as bad Yes, looking forward to your reply
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, contributor,
I recently read the article Towards Explainable In-the-Wild Video Quality Assessment: A Database and a Language-Prompted Approach. Please let me know. I tried a video of my own, and the score felt like it was between 0-100. The values in the paper then correspond to the paper's "Figure 4: Qualitative studies on different specific factors, with a good video (>0.6) and a bad video (<-0.6) in each dimension of Maxwell; [A-5] Trajectory, [ T-5]Flicker, and [T-8] Fluency are focusing on temporal variations and example videos for them are appended in supplementary package. Zoom in for details.", in my example what counts as good and what counts as bad Yes, looking forward to your reply
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: