You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you so much for this enlightening and inspiring work.I don't quite understand why LKC(i.e. Large Kernel Convolution) = DW-Conv + DW-D-Conv + 1x1Conv.
My current understanding can refer to the following table:
So according to my understanding, what you want to express in Fig.2 is: DW-Conv, DW-D-Conv and 1x1Conv each have a part of LKC properties, and have lower computational complexity.That is to say, the plus sign and equal sign in Fig.2 are for the addition of Properties.
Is my understanding correct? If it is not correct, please give a more intuitive understanding. Thank you very much!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you so much for this enlightening and inspiring work.I don't quite understand why LKC(i.e. Large Kernel Convolution) = DW-Conv + DW-D-Conv + 1x1Conv.
My current understanding can refer to the following table:
So according to my understanding, what you want to express in Fig.2 is: DW-Conv, DW-D-Conv and 1x1Conv each have a part of LKC properties, and have lower computational complexity.That is to say, the plus sign and equal sign in Fig.2 are for the addition of Properties.
Is my understanding correct? If it is not correct, please give a more intuitive understanding. Thank you very much!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: