Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug 1.10.2-1.5]Dirty Iron dust is not usable in Enrichment Chamber. #5

Closed
AlphaKintari opened this issue Aug 18, 2016 · 13 comments
Closed

Comments

@AlphaKintari
Copy link

Sounds like a Mekanism problem, but its an interesting issue:

If you have both UniDict-1.10.2-1.5 and industrialcraft-2-2.6.37-ex110 in your modpack, Dirty Iron Dust will not process in the Enrichment Chamber. Other dusts seem to work fine, tested gold, osmium, lead, copper,and tin all work fine.

With just IC2, no UniDict, no issues.
With just UniDict, no IC2, no issues.

Using the default configuration file for all mods.
Its the combination of both of these that seems to cause an issue, leaning towards UniDict because of the way that it changes the dusts.

Mekanism issue for referance

@WanionCane
Copy link
Owner

WanionCane commented Aug 18, 2016

sorry for the late reply.
this is really weird, UniDict don't does anything with the Dirty dusts.

@AlphaKintari
Copy link
Author

no worries, I can send you a testing instance if you would like, it's an odd issue surely. But my guess is that it has something to do with the interaction between the two mods.

@WanionCane
Copy link
Owner

thanks, but there is no need.
I think that after UniDict sort the entries, Mekanism is not recognizing the new entry and is not registering his own dirty dust, lol.

@AlphaKintari
Copy link
Author

heh... I can code in JAVA, but I have little to no experience (alright, no) in how the minecraft ore dictionary works. Who needs to look at this? You or @aidancbrady?

@Utildayael
Copy link

Same issue. I had an issue logged with Mekanism but Aidan closed it out as crossmod problem. Glad to hear someone figured out WHAT is causing it but yes, curious who the fix request needs to go to as well.

Thanks

@WanionCane
Copy link
Owner

It may be UniDict fault, I'm going to do some rewrites in the next few days, may solve this issue, and sorry for how long took to I do something.

@Utildayael
Copy link

Thanks for looking into it! :)

On Sep 6, 2016, at 10:48 AM, WanionCane [email protected] wrote:

It may be UniDict fault, I'm going to do some rewrites in the next few days, may solve this issue, and sorry for how long took to I do something.


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

@WanionCane
Copy link
Owner

after some rewrites, was indeed UniDict fault, I'm really sorry...

@Utildayael
Copy link

No worries. Thank you for fixing it!! :)

On Sep 6, 2016, at 11:40 AM, WanionCane [email protected] wrote:

after some rewrites, was indeed UniDict fault, I'm really sorry...


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

@mainframecn
Copy link

Nice, hope to see the new build soon. I am having the same issue and like to keep using unidict.

@WanionCane
Copy link
Owner

WanionCane commented Sep 6, 2016

could you guys try with this? UniDict-1.10.2-1.8c.

1.7.10 release is coming soon.
edit: UniDict-1.7.10-2.9.1

@mainframecn
Copy link

Seems to be working for me now. Thanks for the quick support!

@WanionCane
Copy link
Owner

not so quick actually XD

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants