Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade textlint-rule-terminology from 3.0.5 to 5.2.7 #50

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

WontonSam
Copy link
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade textlint-rule-terminology from 3.0.5 to 5.2.7.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


⚠️ Warning: This PR contains major version upgrade(s), and may be a breaking change.

  • The recommended version is 43 versions ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released on a month ago.

Release notes
Package name: textlint-rule-terminology
  • 5.2.7 - 2024-09-05

    5.2.7 (2024-09-05)

    Bug Fixes

    • Add "continues integration" → "continuous integration" typo replacement (8c04520)
  • 5.2.6 - 2024-08-02

    5.2.6 (2024-08-02)

    Bug Fixes

  • 5.2.5 - 2024-08-02

    5.2.5 (2024-08-02)

    Bug Fixes

    • Fix "Invalid regular expression" introduced in the previous commit (5eecfce)
  • 5.2.4 - 2024-08-02

    5.2.4 (2024-08-02)

    Bug Fixes

    • Cath more wrongly-spelled naming conventions (4a4cdbd)
  • 5.2.3 - 2024-07-29

    5.2.3 (2024-07-29)

    Bug Fixes

    • Fix invalid JSON file with terms (942153e), closes #78
  • 5.2.2 - 2024-07-27

    5.2.2 (2024-07-27)

    Bug Fixes

  • 5.2.1 - 2024-07-26

    5.2.1 (2024-07-26)

    Bug Fixes

  • 5.2.0 - 2024-07-26

    5.2.0 (2024-07-26)

    Bug Fixes

    Features

    • Upgrade the project setup (c6affe2)
  • 5.1.9 - 2024-07-25

    5.1.9 (2024-07-25)

    Bug Fixes

    • Replace "blank line" with "empty line" (8af492e)
  • 5.1.8 - 2024-07-08

    5.1.8 (2024-07-08)

    Bug Fixes

  • 5.1.7 - 2024-07-08
  • 5.1.6 - 2024-07-08
  • 5.1.5 - 2024-07-01
  • 5.1.4 - 2024-06-30
  • 5.1.3 - 2024-06-30
  • 5.1.2 - 2024-06-30
  • 5.1.1 - 2024-06-29
  • 5.1.0 - 2024-06-28
  • 5.0.22 - 2024-06-28
  • 5.0.21 - 2024-06-28
  • 5.0.20 - 2024-06-28
  • 5.0.19 - 2024-06-27
  • 5.0.18 - 2024-06-27
  • 5.0.17 - 2024-06-26
  • 5.0.16 - 2024-06-26
  • 5.0.15 - 2024-06-21
  • 5.0.14 - 2024-06-21
  • 5.0.13 - 2024-06-15
  • 5.0.12 - 2024-06-10
  • 5.0.11 - 2024-06-09
  • 5.0.10 - 2024-06-04
  • 5.0.9 - 2024-05-25
  • 5.0.8 - 2024-05-25
  • 5.0.7 - 2024-05-25
  • 5.0.6 - 2024-05-25
  • 5.0.5 - 2024-05-24
  • 5.0.4 - 2024-05-24
  • 5.0.3 - 2024-05-24
  • 5.0.2 - 2024-05-22
  • 5.0.1 - 2024-05-21
  • 5.0.0 - 2024-05-01
  • 4.0.1 - 2023-11-06
  • 4.0.0 - 2023-09-01
  • 3.0.5 - 2023-06-21
from textlint-rule-terminology GitHub release notes

Important

  • Warning: This PR contains a major version upgrade, and may be a breaking change.
  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade textlint-rule-terminology from 3.0.5 to 5.2.7.

See this package in npm:
textlint-rule-terminology

See this project in Snyk:
https://app.snyk.io/org/cachiman/project/4351fd45-d634-4280-b037-2d3bfbd0187b?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
Copy link

google-cla bot commented Oct 10, 2024

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants