To understand if the filtering equipment has a rule for *.censored.net
or not it
can be interesting to measure the lantency of looking up random-subdomain.censored.net
as this would cause recursive resolution when no such rule exists. Conversely if the
policy is to block anything containing censored.net
the response may arrive earlier,
because there is no extra latency caused by the recursive resolution.
There are however some caveats in this approach. Indeed, if the recursor hosts a zone for
censored.net
it does not have to query the censored.net
NS
for the domain. But
it’s not a 100% clear signal as some DNSSEC versions may leak cacheable ranges
of non-existent domains. Also, NSes responsible for the censored.net
zone may be
unreachable1 and that information may be cached as well, that will also affect
resolution latency.
1: e.g. some israeli authoritative DNS servers were dropping requests from Egypt