Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes incorrect description of RDS encryption policy #542

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2021

Conversation

alex-petrov-vt
Copy link
Contributor

Changed description to reflect the actual content of the policy as suggested in #538

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Feb 7, 2021

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 7, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #542 (91c018a) into master (dabcffb) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #542   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   75.34%   75.34%           
=======================================
  Files          94       94           
  Lines        2235     2235           
=======================================
  Hits         1684     1684           
  Misses        408      408           
  Partials      143      143           

@kanchwala-yusuf
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @alex-petrov-vt for your contribution. I'll let @cesar-rodriguez take a look at this as well.

Copy link
Contributor

@cesar-rodriguez cesar-rodriguez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants