Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

The product of passivity indices does have a theoretical upper bound. #136

Closed
MrstupidJ opened this issue Nov 2, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #140
Closed

The product of passivity indices does have a theoretical upper bound. #136

MrstupidJ opened this issue Nov 2, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #140
Assignees
@MrstupidJ

Comments

@MrstupidJ
Copy link
Contributor

MrstupidJ commented Nov 2, 2023 •
edited
Loading

In our package, we might have an upper bound for $\rho \nu$ that is more strict (smaller), but it actually makes sense in theory. We should throw an error if user breaks this condition.

We can modify this in the future version.
@MrstupidJ MrstupidJ self-assigned this Nov 2, 2023
@MrstupidJ MrstupidJ changed the title The product of passivity indices $\rho$ or $\nu$ does have a theoretical upper bound. The product of passivity indices does have a theoretical upper bound. Nov 2, 2023
@nic-barbara nic-barbara linked a pull request Nov 25, 2023 that will close this issue
Issue 136 139 #140
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@MrstupidJ MrstupidJ

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Issue 136 139 acfr/RobustNeuralNetworks.jl
1 participant
@MrstupidJ