You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since the ExplicitParam has already included the output layer, maybe we should merge the output layer param into directparams as well. So it will correspond to the implicit G in the paper. How do you think?
Best
Ray
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Ray, I've been thinking about doing this but haven't gotten around to it yet. What was Max's reasoning for keeping them separate in the first place?
I agree that they should be merged, particularly now that we have a D22 term that depends on all the direct parameters.
The possible reasons are as follows: 1) make it close to classic RNN,LSTM, having a separate output layer; 2) at the beginning we choose D22=0, so the output layer is decoupled from internal dynamics; 3) for the observer example we just need the state dynamics.
Hi Nic,
Since the ExplicitParam has already included the output layer, maybe we should merge the output layer param into directparams as well. So it will correspond to the implicit G in the paper. How do you think?
Best
Ray
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: