Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

List of papers that are not exported correctly #107

Closed
villalbamartin opened this issue Jan 9, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

List of papers that are not exported correctly #107

villalbamartin opened this issue Jan 9, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@villalbamartin
Copy link
Collaborator

There's a list of papers that fail to export, and I'm opening this ticket to keep track of what's going on. Most of these papers fail with the error NoMethodError: undefined method 'title' for nil:NilClass, which is an error that doesn't make sense because those papers do have titles. Seeing as how most of them end in 000 (see the list down below), I believe there's an issue with papers that represent volumes rather than single entries.

I'll look deeper into this.

Here's the list of paper IDs that fail to export properly:

  • C69: 0100, 0101, 0200, 0201, 0300, 0301, 0400, 0401, 0500, 0501, 0600, 0601, 0700, 0701, 0800, 0801, 0900, 0901
  • J00: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J01: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J02: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J03: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J04: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J05: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J06: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J07: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J08: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J09: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J10: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J11: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J12: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J13: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J14: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J15: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J16: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J17: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J18: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J79: 1000
  • J80: 1000, 2000, 3000
  • J81: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J82: 1000, 2000, 3000
  • J83: 1000, 2000, 3000
  • J84: 1000, 2000, 3000
  • J85: 1000, 2000, 4000
  • J86: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J87: 1000, 3000
  • J88: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J89: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J90: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J91: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J92: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J93: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J94: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J95: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J96: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J97: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J98: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
  • J99: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000
@knmnyn
Copy link
Collaborator

knmnyn commented Jan 10, 2019

We probably want to exclude the J and Q volumes from this process since they (CL and TACL) don't have such frontmatter typically accompanies both workshop and conference venues. That should be pretty easy a fix to add a conditional for those.

@mjpost
Copy link
Member

mjpost commented Jan 22, 2019

Thanks for cataloguing this! Ideally we would not print the PDF (or bib) links if the URLs don't resolve.

@mbollmann
Copy link
Member

The C69 issue is a consequence of faulty XML, in my opinion. In the database import script, IDs of the form "x000" get interpreted as proceedings volumes, except for workshops, where it is IDs of the form "xx00". In C69.xml, volumes follow the workshop format, which leads to the first nine papers being ignored until a "proper" volume ID (1000) is found.

However, IMHO, the actual issue is that each paper has its own proceedings entry, which doesn't seem correct or useful to me. I believe the file should have a single proceedings entry with ID 1000, and the individual papers should be renumbered 0101 -> 1001, 0201 -> 1002, 0301 -> 1003, and so on.

@mjpost
Copy link
Member

mjpost commented Feb 20, 2019

This seems right to me about C69. I just created an issue (#147) for it specifically, since it will require hand-correction.

@mjpost
Copy link
Member

mjpost commented Jun 25, 2019

I believe these were all fixed with #324, in which I checked whether the frontmatter PDF existed and removed the <url> tag if not.

@mjpost mjpost closed this as completed Jun 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants