We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I've made a number of attempts to call xAPI/OAuth/initiate using a few different off the shelf OAuth 1.0a libraries.
For example -
// Dependencies const request = require('request') const OAuth = require('oauth-1.0a') const crypto = require('crypto') process.env["NODE_TLS_REJECT_UNAUTHORIZED"] = 0; // Initialize const oauth = OAuth({ consumer: { key: 'f736064db682425f9fdc41c4db62cc08', secret: '4aBK3L9aYyliEp3w', }, signature_method: 'HMAC-SHA1', hash_function(base_string, key) { return crypto .createHmac('sha1', key) .update(base_string) .digest('base64') }, }) const request_data = { url: 'https://127.0.0.1/xAPI/OAuth/initiate', method: 'POST', data: {oauth_callback: 'oob'} } // Note: The token is optional for some requests // const token = { // key: 'd587c1612bbb4153a44c3a42d6ef6d5a', // secret: 'vWALvHvT6nWX9Swm', // } request( { url: request_data.url, method: request_data.method, form: oauth.authorize(request_data, ''), // token }, function(error, response, body) { // Process your data here console.log('ERROR:\n' + error, response, body); } )
All that comes back is "Could not verify OAuth request" and a DENY. Not much info on how to obtain temp token beyond that.
Is there a cleaner mechanism of proving this is functioning?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
I've made a number of attempts to call xAPI/OAuth/initiate using a few different off the shelf OAuth 1.0a libraries.
For example -
All that comes back is "Could not verify OAuth request" and a DENY.
Not much info on how to obtain temp token beyond that.
Is there a cleaner mechanism of proving this is functioning?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: