-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow annotating and separating advanced options for each connector config in the UI #3681
Comments
For 1. Is your feeling that the asterisk for required fields isn't clear enough? |
@sherifnada I do not think that adding Then we could add some sort of an
|
circling back to advocate for the importance of this issue: right now I’m very averse to exposing things like this because for 99% of users they’re not relevant and will just cause confusion/a worse impression of the polish of the product. But there is objective value in exposing this kind of configuration, even as an intermediate state before doing something more intelligent inside the connector. Having this ticket would relieve us from having to make hard tradeoffs between serving different personas |
Closing in favor of #14247 |
Tell us about the problem you're trying to solve
There are a few options on connectors which 95% of users don't need. For example, the freshdesk connector exposes an option to specify how many requests per minute the connector should make i.e: self throttling. the purpose of this option is to avoid hogging all the API bandwidth if the token is shared by many users:
While this is useful, most users probably don't care about this option. So showing it to them is a little confusing.
Describe the solution you’d like
I would like to suggest two improvements here:
We should have a separate, collapsible section for advanced properties. If a property in
spec.json
has theadvanced: true
annotation it should be displayed in the advanced options section.It would be great to have an expandable section like this:
(different app but you get the idea)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: