You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is a very nice paper and thanks for keeping the code online. I have a doubt regarding how you include viscosity and force function in your input. For example in the original paper, for Navier stokes, the input shape to fourier layer was (batch_size, grid_x, grid_y, widths).
Did you incorporate viscosity and forcing function in this input? If so, can you please let me know how you added these parameters? Viscosity I believe is a scalar, so I am confused how it fit in the inputs.
Looking forward for your reply,
Thanks. Tariq
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Did you incorporate viscosity and forcing function in this input?
Yes, even though viscosity is a scalar, you can also think of it as a constant function over the (x,y) coordinates. So for every point on the grid, we have 5 pieces of information: vorticity, external force, viscosity, x-coordinate, and y-coordinate. Thus our input shape is now [batch_size, grid_x, grid_y, 5].
Hi,
This is a very nice paper and thanks for keeping the code online. I have a doubt regarding how you include viscosity and force function in your input. For example in the original paper, for Navier stokes, the input shape to fourier layer was (batch_size, grid_x, grid_y, widths).
Did you incorporate viscosity and forcing function in this input? If so, can you please let me know how you added these parameters? Viscosity I believe is a scalar, so I am confused how it fit in the inputs.
Looking forward for your reply,
Thanks. Tariq
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: