We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
We would like to see a normal library versioning without mimicking the old gmail era and permanent beta suffixes.
We have to explain to end developers and customers that flex beta is safe to use all of the time
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Duplicate of #835
Sorry, something went wrong.
This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity. Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.
Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.
This action has been performed automatically by a bot.
No branches or pull requests
Feature Request
What is the desired behavior?
We would like to see a normal library versioning without mimicking the old gmail era and permanent beta suffixes.
What is the use-case or motivation for the desired behavior?
We have to explain to end developers and customers that flex beta is safe to use all of the time
Is there anything else we should know?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: