Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Import of mesh including radiation fails #17

Closed
JackGuyver opened this issue Mar 11, 2021 · 3 comments · Fixed by #34
Closed

Import of mesh including radiation fails #17

JackGuyver opened this issue Mar 11, 2021 · 3 comments · Fixed by #34

Comments

@JackGuyver
Copy link
Contributor

I recently created some thermal simulation cases that include radiation boundary conditions, exported the corresponding mesh to a CDB file and tried to read it using the Archive class:

from ansys.mapdl import reader as pymapdl_reader
arcv = pymapdl_reader.Archive("ErnoRadiation.CDB", parse_vtk=False)

For some cases the reader will then freeze. If I suppress the radiation bc, the mesh is read smoothly.
I was able to boil the effect down to a very simple testcase that I attached.

Cube.zip

@akaszynski
Copy link
Collaborator

Transferring to the reader repository. I'll look into this and push an update either on Friday or over the weekend.

@akaszynski akaszynski transferred this issue from ansys/pymapdl Mar 11, 2021
@akaszynski
Copy link
Collaborator

akaszynski commented Mar 22, 2021

Sorry this one took so long to get to. I should be more careful when saying "over the weekend".

Bug is related to the placement of the RLBLOCK reader. File reads correctly now, and be on the lookout the next release ansys-mapdl-reader, which should be out by the end of today has been released.

https://pypi.org/project/ansys-mapdl-reader/

@JackGuyver
Copy link
Contributor Author

No problem at all.
Getting the solution served on a (release-) plate after less then two weeks is still a wonderful response time and kind of support.
I can indeed confirm that my testcase now gets read exactly as expected. I'll move on to the more realistic geometries next.

Thank you very much for your fix, your work on this tool is very much appreciated!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants