Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Large EPE for optical flow evaluation #23

Open
DeckerDai opened this issue Feb 4, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Large EPE for optical flow evaluation #23

DeckerDai opened this issue Feb 4, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@DeckerDai
Copy link

DeckerDai commented Feb 4, 2020

Hey Anurag, thanks for your wonderful work!

I got the following results when running test_flow.py:

epe_total epe_sp epe_mv Fl epe_total_gt_mask epe_sp_gt_mask epe_mv_gt_mask Fl_gt_mask
Errors 81.6802 6.4460 174.5231 0.6040 36.2934 6.3183 183.9449 0.4385

This seems pretty large, especially the EPE.

I run the evaluation in the same way as mentioned in the readme, with the following script:

model_dir=/path/to/cc_models/geometry
cd /path/to/cc/
python test_flow.py \
    --pretrained-disp="$model_dir/dispnet_cs_k.pth.tar" \
    --pretrained-pose="$model_dir/posenet.pth.tar" \
    --pretrained-mask="$model_dir/masknet.pth.tar" \
    --pretrained-flow="$model_dir/back2future.pth.tar" \
    --kitti-dir=/path/to/kitti_data/

All other settings are set as default. My PyTorch and cuda version are 1.4.0 and 10.0.

Is there something wrong? Or I miss something?

Thanks in advance!
Best,

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant