Check saved hash first during probing bucket in aggr hash table

[Rachelint]

Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?

Now two part aggregate hash table is used in datafusion, and we actually saved the hashes of groups in the hash table part.
But I found the saved hashes are not used during probing bucket, and we directly get group values and comapre instead, that will lead to many random memory accesses, and the compare operations are not cheap for some types.

Describe the solution you'd like

Maybe we should check the saved hashes first, and only check the group values when hashes are same for avoid collision.

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

I run the clickbench in local, it seems help to some cases.

┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓
┃ Query        ┃       main ┃ check-hash-first ┃        Change ┃
┡━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┩
│ QQuery 0     │     0.81ms │           0.77ms │ +1.06x faster │
│ QQuery 1     │    69.11ms │          69.79ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 2     │   169.47ms │         160.89ms │ +1.05x faster │
│ QQuery 3     │   182.60ms │         180.05ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 4     │  1589.41ms │        1595.87ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 5     │  1597.02ms │        1563.24ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 6     │    57.92ms │          59.34ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 7     │    72.33ms │          71.02ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 8     │  2415.02ms │        2293.14ms │ +1.05x faster │
│ QQuery 9     │  1928.42ms │        1912.94ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 10    │   544.39ms │         539.45ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 11    │   605.79ms │         606.26ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 12    │  1767.57ms │        1748.26ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 13    │  4073.33ms │        3979.57ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 14    │  2583.14ms │        2518.41ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 15    │  1784.13ms │        1777.43ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 16    │  5028.55ms │        4898.04ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 17    │  4956.14ms │        4796.22ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 18    │ 10436.51ms │       10168.34ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 19    │   144.11ms │         147.18ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 20    │  3310.77ms │        3286.34ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 21    │  3887.09ms │        3867.43ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 22    │  9398.96ms │        9008.04ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 23    │ 23087.26ms │       22804.51ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 24    │  1168.15ms │        1139.59ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 25    │  1046.92ms │        1010.22ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 26    │  1352.80ms │        1317.86ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 27    │  4711.92ms │        4698.67ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 28    │ 21891.92ms │       22870.99ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 29    │   920.19ms │         901.89ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 30    │  2075.81ms │        2036.71ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 31    │  2961.03ms │        2844.67ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 32    │ 16167.05ms │       15106.28ms │ +1.07x faster │
│ QQuery 33    │  9418.20ms │        9429.24ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 34    │  9388.74ms │        9431.36ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 35    │  3108.34ms │        3021.89ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 36    │   270.02ms │         269.25ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 37    │   166.63ms │         156.78ms │ +1.06x faster │
│ QQuery 38    │   158.33ms │         157.94ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 39    │   834.47ms │         844.51ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 40    │    63.22ms │          62.05ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 41    │    59.97ms │          58.34ms │     no change │
│ QQuery 42    │    70.34ms │          72.41ms │     no change │
└──────────────┴────────────┴──────────────────┴───────────────┘

[Rachelint]

take