-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 472
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dependencies evaluation for all existing codebases. Various SDK makes mentors(further IPMC) a little hard to get the dependency list, with licenses. #3615
Comments
Let's create a dependency report per bindings (links are to the resolutions below) -
|
The external dependencies in runtime for bindings/java is -
|
There is no external dependency for the under-developing Zig and .NET bindings. |
Many of our bindings, perhaps due to its premature, do not introduce extra dependencies actually. cc @Xuanwo @suyanhanx @messense @Zheaoli please try to comment the bindings extra dependencies except Core's. And cc other binding maintainers as you know. |
For the nodejs binding:
|
For Python Bindings, the dependency has been split into two parts For benchmark
For test
For release
|
For bindings/haskell:
|
For bindings/lua:
|
For bindings/ruby: rb_sys: MIT, APACHE-2.0 |
For bindings/C:
no runtime extra deps |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Closed as resolved. Thanks for all the contributors :D |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: