-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 867
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Provide the option to avoid fast-tracked rollbacks #1748
Comments
An option to avoid fast-tracked rollbacks means that we should run steps/pauses/analysis when going back. However the use case you describe doesn't seem to want that either, so I don't think executing the steps/analysis/pauses is what you want as opposed to limiting the total number of replicas when going back. Have you tried the dynamicStableScale which balances the total replica counts according to traffic weights? |
This issue is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. |
This issue is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. |
Summary
Currently argo rollouts performs a "fast-tracked rollback" (which skips pauses, steps, analysis) in two circumstances:
we detect if we are moving back to a blue-green ReplicaSet which exists and is still scaled up (within its scaleDownDelay)
if we are moving back to the canary's "stable" ReplicaSet and the upgrade has not yet completed.
(copy from #574)
I want to find a way to choose not to use "fast-tracked rollback" in some situations.
Use Cases
For example, an application needs to avoid multiple instances being started at the same time due to insufficient performance of the surrounding system, but sometimes we need to rollback during the canary.
Message from the maintainers:
Impacted by this bug? Give it a 👍. We prioritize the issues with the most 👍.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: