Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: fix !important block typo #2372

Merged

Conversation

thomas-riccardi
Copy link
Contributor

@thomas-riccardi thomas-riccardi commented Oct 26, 2022

also, normalize all blocks with a space before the keyword.

Checklist:

  • Either (a) I've created an enhancement proposal and discussed it with the community, (b) this is a bug fix, or (c) this is a chore.
  • The title of the PR is (a) conventional with a list of types and scopes found here, (b) states what changed, and (c) suffixes the related issues number. E.g. "fix(controller): Updates such and such. Fixes #1234".
  • I've signed my commits with DCO
  • I have written unit and/or e2e tests for my change. PRs without these are unlikely to be merged.
  • My builds are green. Try syncing with master if they are not.
  • My organization is added to USERS.md.

also, normalize all blocks with a space before the keyword.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Riccardi <[email protected]>
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Oct 26, 2022

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Go Published Test Results

1 778 tests   1 778 ✔️  2m 30s ⏱️
   101 suites         0 💤
       1 files           0

Results for commit f6600e2.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 26, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 82.76% // Head: 82.76% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (f6600e2) compared to base (2cf256b).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2372   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.76%   82.76%           
=======================================
  Files         121      121           
  Lines       18536    18536           
=======================================
  Hits        15341    15341           
  Misses       2410     2410           
  Partials      785      785           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

E2E Tests Published Test Results

89 tests   86 ✔️  44m 28s ⏱️
  1 suites    3 💤
  1 files      0

Results for commit f6600e2.

@zachaller zachaller added ready-for-review Ready for final review hacktoberfest-accepted Accepted Hacktoberfest contribution labels Oct 27, 2022
@zachaller zachaller merged commit da92e2c into argoproj:master Nov 7, 2022
@thomas-riccardi thomas-riccardi deleted the docs-fix-important-block-typo branch November 8, 2022 15:58
jandersen-plaid pushed a commit to jandersen-plaid/argo-rollouts that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2022
also, normalize all blocks with a space before the keyword.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Riccardi <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Thomas Riccardi <[email protected]>
jandersen-plaid pushed a commit to jandersen-plaid/argo-rollouts that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2022
also, normalize all blocks with a space before the keyword.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Riccardi <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Thomas Riccardi <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hacktoberfest-accepted Accepted Hacktoberfest contribution ready-for-review Ready for final review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants