Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Skip unnecessary CI workflows if only have documentary changes #10156

Closed
LinuxSuRen opened this issue Dec 2, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #12006
Closed

Skip unnecessary CI workflows if only have documentary changes #10156

LinuxSuRen opened this issue Dec 2, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #12006
Assignees
@agilgur5
Labels
area/build Build or GithubAction/CI issues area/docs Incorrect, missing, or mistakes in docs type/feature Feature request type/tech-debt

Comments

@LinuxSuRen
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

As I mentioned in the title. It's totally not necessary to run the whole workflow all the time.

Use Cases

As you can see below, I only made some documentary changes in this PR

image

See #10155

We could skip the e2e workflow by some filters.

Message from the maintainers:

Love this enhancement proposal? Give it a 👍. We prioritise the proposals with the most 👍.
@LinuxSuRen LinuxSuRen added the type/feature Feature request label Dec 2, 2022
@caelan-io
Copy link
Member

agreed. we are considering this. related to #10265

@agilgur5 agilgur5 added the area/build Build or GithubAction/CI issues label Sep 21, 2023
@agilgur5 agilgur5 self-assigned this Sep 21, 2023
@agilgur5 agilgur5 added type/tech-debt area/docs Incorrect, missing, or mistakes in docs labels Sep 21, 2023
This was referenced Oct 14, 2023
Closed
Merged
@agilgur5 agilgur5 changed the title Suggestion: skip unnecessary workflows if only have documentary changes Skip unnecessary CI workflows if only have documentary changes Jul 12, 2024
@argoproj argoproj locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 12, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@agilgur5 agilgur5

Labels
area/build Build or GithubAction/CI issues area/docs Incorrect, missing, or mistakes in docs type/feature Feature request type/tech-debt
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
3 participants
@LinuxSuRen @agilgur5 @caelan-io