Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optimize MNT4/6 pairing (2-NAF Miller loop) #57

Closed
yelhousni opened this issue Oct 14, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Optimize MNT4/6 pairing (2-NAF Miller loop) #57

yelhousni opened this issue Oct 14, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
T-feature Type: new features T-performance Type: performance improvements

Comments

@yelhousni
Copy link

Currently, MNT4/6 pairing is implemented in projective coordinate with a binary Miller loop.
Note that the Hamming weight of ATE_LOOP_COUNT for both MNT298 and MNT753 is lower when decomposed in 2-NAF. I suggest to implement 2-NAF Miller loop for MNT4 and MNT6.

@Pratyush Pratyush transferred this issue from arkworks-rs/snark Nov 20, 2020
@Pratyush Pratyush added T-feature Type: new features T-performance Type: performance improvements labels Nov 20, 2020
@mmagician
Copy link
Member

Closed in #445.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
T-feature Type: new features T-performance Type: performance improvements
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants