We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
schemaFormat
Check discussion about it #542 (comment)
Probably in the 3.0.0 AsyncAPI we will move schemaFormat to the Schema Object - asyncapi/spec#622
3.0.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If we finally don't go on this, we should add the schemaFormat method to the message instead, which is missing even in the interface.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Done in #582
No branches or pull requests
Check discussion about it #542 (comment)
Probably in the
3.0.0
AsyncAPI we will moveschemaFormat
to the Schema Object - asyncapi/spec#622The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: