Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Fork & Maintenance Request] double-tag, autoclose-html-plus, emmet #474

Open
1 task done
zhaolinlau opened this issue Oct 8, 2022 · 5 comments
Open
1 task done

Comments

@zhaolinlau
Copy link

Have you checked for existing feature requests?

  • Completed

Summary

The packages to speed up the workflow of web development and improve the convenience on completing HTML tags.

Enter your response below:

In my opinion, a text editor which supports for web development should have some HTML tag features which are able to edit both HTML start and end tag at the same time, able to autoclose HTML tag after completing a HTML start tag like , and also the emmet which very useful to speed up the workflow of web development.

Any alternatives?

  1. double-tag by dsandstrom

  2. autoclose-html-plus by binaryfunt

  3. emmet by emmetio

@ThatXliner
Copy link
Member

In my opinion, my editor should be minimal starting with only syntax highlighting for popular languages.

I remember there was a discussion about this somewhere.

@zhaolinlau
Copy link
Author

In my opinion, my editor should be minimal starting with only syntax highlighting for popular languages.

I remember there was a discussion about this somewhere.

I know, that's why it's not about feature request, it's about to pickup the packages due to atom sunsetting.

@rjousse18
Copy link

I agree about autoclose html tag, I think it can be a good native feature, but double tag or emmet should be optional

@zhaolinlau
Copy link
Author

I agree about autoclose html tag, I think it can be a good native feature, but double tag or emmet should be optional

Bro this is not feature request lol, this is about to keep the packages alive

@rjousse18
Copy link

Ho ok sorry, mb

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants