What parts, if any, are licensed under Eclipse Public License - v 1.0?

[matthewlmcclure]

The Eclipse Public License - v 1.0 (EPL 1.0) is included in LICENSE.APACHE.txt, but I didn't find specified what parts of the code are licensed under the EPL 1.0.

Separately, the NOTICE.txt file states that the Eclipse Paho Java Client is licensed under the Eclipse Distribution License - v 1.0 (EDL 1.0).

The LICENSE.txt file doesn't mention any of the Eclipse Paho Java Client, the EPL, or the EDL.

What, if anything, is licensed under EPL 1.0? Should the above reference the EDL 1.0 instead of the EPL 1.0?

[lawmicha]

The license file https://github.com/aws-amplify/aws-sdk-android/blob/release_v2.52.1/LICENSE.txt is the most recent and mentions the license is under Apache 2.0 License. This is the correct reflection for most of the modules, except for the one mentioned in there about Amazon Cognito Identity Provider.

I believe

aws-sdk-android/LICENSE.APACHE.txt

Line 213 in 8de4879

Eclipse Public License - v 1.0

does not need EPL outline in there and can be removed. (PR here #3611)

aws-sdk-android/NOTICE.txt

Line 47 in 8de4879

- Eclipse Paho Java Client - Copyright (c) 2007, Eclipse Foundation, Inc. and its licensors. (Eclipse Distribution License - v1.0)

is a reference to Third Party Component's license

aws-sdk-android/NOTICE.txt

Lines 22 to 24 in 8de4879

	**********************
	THIRD PARTY COMPONENTS
	**********************

and was added 9 years ago in this commit ce68ab5 I suspect that this was a dependency's license, and is more of a FYI than the license we are taking on.

Let me know if that helps answers your questions.

[matthewlmcclure]

@lawmicha That helps clarify. Thank you.