You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
we currently use CSV and ORC rather than Parquet for our data lake objects.
In an ideal world we probably migrate to parquet which would enable us to use this project, but that's currently a project with a lot of unknowns on our side - if s3-find-and-forget supported ORC and CSV it would enable us to test out the project on our existing data sets.
We understand that this could result in increased costs and reduced performance vs. parquet - but it would still be helpful at this point.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, thanks for your interest in Amazon S3 Find and Forget.
CSV support has already been requested in #175, so I'm going to rename this issue to cover ORC support only. Please follow #175 for updates on CSV support.
We use issue popularity as one input to prioritise future development, so please add a 👍 to the initial post if ORC support would be useful for your use case. We'll post any updates on ORC support in this issue.
ctd
changed the title
orc and csv support
ORC support
Nov 5, 2020
we currently use CSV and ORC rather than Parquet for our data lake objects.
In an ideal world we probably migrate to parquet which would enable us to use this project, but that's currently a project with a lot of unknowns on our side - if s3-find-and-forget supported ORC and CSV it would enable us to test out the project on our existing data sets.
We understand that this could result in increased costs and reduced performance vs. parquet - but it would still be helpful at this point.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: